GUIDE 03 · INTERFACE AND SETTINGS
Know where your research lives before you start the task.
A companion to the third Wisp Science video: understand the workspace, decide which settings matter for the current project, and complete a short preflight before handing work to the Agent.
Original video published
01 / What you will learn
What you will learn
- Tell the difference between a project, a conversation, source files, and generated artifacts.
- Recognize which choices persist with the project and which permissions belong to one session.
- Check the model, endpoint, compute environment, and approval policy before a long task.
- Keep API keys and other credentials out of prompts, documents, and repositories.
- Use a repeatable preflight to catch configuration problems before research begins.
02 / Before you begin
Before you begin
- Install a current Wisp Science release and create a local project.
- Have the endpoint and credentials for the model provider you intend to use.
- Know whether the task may access sensitive local data or an external compute service.
1. Read the workspace as a research record
The interface becomes easier to understand when every area has a job. The project is the durable boundary for the research; conversations hold individual lines of work; source files provide inputs; and artifacts such as reports, tables, figures, scripts, and logs are the outputs you need to inspect.
Begin by confirming the active project and conversation. A correct answer saved in the wrong project is still hard to find, review, and hand over later.
2. Separate project state from session permissions
Projects preserve research context over time, but not every capability should remain globally enabled. In the current release, local computing is available by default while SSH or WSL resources must be selected for the conversation that needs them.
That boundary is useful: one project may contain several conversations with different data, tools, and risk levels. Review the active conversation before granting a remote environment or starting a command-heavy workflow.
3. Verify the model connection before the real task
Check the provider, endpoint, model name, and credential location before starting a long literature or data-analysis run. A short test request can reveal an invalid model name, an unreachable endpoint, or an exhausted quota before time is spent assembling the workflow.
Model credentials belong in the application setting designed for secrets. For remote MCP OAuth connections, v0.15.0 stores access and refresh tokens in the operating-system keychain. Do not paste an API key into a prompt, project document, screenshot, or code repository.
4. Review settings according to their consequences
You do not need to configure every option on the first day. Start with the settings that change where data goes, what the Agent may execute, and how much work it may do in one turn.
- General: choose a practical Agent iteration limit; zero means unlimited in v0.15.0.
- Environment: inspect local, SSH, or WSL capabilities and select only what this conversation needs.
- Remote access: enable Feishu/Lark or WeChat only when you intend to continue the session from that service.
- MCP connections: review the destination and OAuth consent before adding an optional remote service.
5. Run a sixty-second preflight
Before a costly or sensitive task, confirm the project, conversation, model, compute environment, approval boundary, input files, and expected output. Then run the smallest request that proves the path works.
If the task will contact an external model, database, MCP server, remote machine, or messaging service, decide whether the data is appropriate to send there before the first tool call.
- Correct project and conversation selected.
- Model connection passes a small test.
- Only the required compute and remote services are enabled.
- Input paths are stable and output expectations are explicit.
- Sensitive data and credentials stay outside prompts and shared artifacts.
6. Resolve interface differences with the release note
Settings and panel positions can change as Wisp Science develops. When the screen differs from the recording, identify the installed version first, then use the matching release note and current documentation instead of guessing from an older screenshot.
This keeps the video useful as an orientation guide while the release page remains the authority for version-specific behavior.
SUMMARY
Key takeaways
- 01
A project organizes the research record; a conversation scopes one line of work.
- 02
Model, compute, approval, and remote-access settings determine both capability and data exposure.
- 03
A small preflight is faster than debugging a long task after it has started.
- 04
Use the video for orientation and the matching release note for version-specific details.
Source and attribution
Source and attribution
This written companion is based on the Chinese-language video by M78的微型小怪兽. The Bilibili upload remains the original source and complete interface walkthrough.
Video demonstration and narration: M78的微型小怪兽
Edited by: Wisp Science project
References